motion in November to move the court case to Detroit's federal court, citing personal and financial hardships. The prosecution objected. In a February 12, 2012 pleading, Assistant United States Attorney Karin Orenstein argued, among other points, that venue in New York is presumed to be proper, that having multiple trials in two separate circuit jurisdictions is unreasonably cumbersome, and that handling and presenting delicate cultural artifact evidence favors presenting the case in New York.
Judge Edward Korman's February 29, 2012 order states simply: "Argument heard. Motion denied w/o prejudice to renew."
CONTACT: www.culturalheritagelawyer.com
CONTACT: www.culturalheritagelawyer.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment