With most people, misconceptions and misunderstandings guide their decisions when deciding whether or not they should fight a ticket. Below is some advice from a former prosecutor...
1) You're not the only one that thinks you can just "talk to a prosecutor" and get your ticket dismissed.
Two to three times a week, most courts hold conferences between the prosecutor and citizens who had received citations. During these conferences, most people go to the prosecutor immediately to ask for a dismissal on their citation. I would venture to say that in a metropolitan area, a municipal prosecutor gets asked for a dismissal between 25-50 times per week. Starting your conversation off with a prosecutor by asking for a dismissal is the least effective approach for negotiating a favorable result. The concept of a dismissal is WIDELY misunderstood and the bottom line is that dismissals are rare.
2) Instead of demanding your dismissal, start by pointing out legitimate issues with your ticket.
There are legitimate issues with citations. Those issues can result in dismissals. But for every one legitimate issue, there are one-hundred ridiculous excuses. A municipal prosecutor has heard them all and there is a really good chance that the prosecutor has heard your specific excuse many, many times. Most of the time, people come go to court with an assumption about the law and they hang on to it with everything they are worth. Do some research before coming to court to determine whether you have a "legitimate issue" or just "another excuse". Whether that means consulting with an attorney or jumping onto Google, come to court with a little research and you may actually put the prosecutor in a better mood.
3) Document your defense.
If you have documentation (especially on vehicle equipment issues, inspections, registrations, licenses, and insurance), bring it to court and have it ORGANIZED and ready for the prosecutor to look at. If there is some legitimate discrepancy between the status of your vehicle or license (on the date of the citation) and the citation you received you might actually get that all-elusive dismissal, but you had better have documentation to support your defense.
4) "Fine, I'll take it to trial."
It's got a nice ring to it, but the reality of a trial is that most cases will come down to the officer's testimony versus the defendant's testimony. More than likely, the officer will testify that he's been an officer for multiple years, been through training and education specifically for observing and enforcing traffic violations. He'll also testify that he spends 90% of his 8-10 hour shift in and amongst traffic observing traffic and that he was focused solely on looking for your vehicle violating a traffic law. Meanwhile, you'll testify (if you choose to testify) that you're number one priority was not following the traffic laws (I dare you to say that it was), but that you were on the way to work, dropping kids off at school, going to the grocery store or had some other objective in mind. The bottom line with trial: The officer will testify that he observed you commit a traffic violation and you'll testify you didn't and the judge or jury will decide who they believe.
5) If you really want a chance...
..hire an attorney. He or she will analyze your citation based on current law and the rules of evidence and procedure and not just based on what you heard from your neighbor's friend's ex boyfriend. Ultimately, you may decide that hiring an attorney would cost more than it is worth, but it you really want a fighting chance, you should hire an attorney. Sumber http://thetrialwarrior.blogspot.com/
Advertisiment
Kategori
10th Ct. of Appeals
11th Ct. of Appeals
13th Ct. of Appeals
4th Amendment
5th Amendment
5th Circuit
5th Ct. of Appeals
6th Ct. of Appeals
8th Ct. of Appeals
admiralty and maritime law
Ancient Coin Collectors Guild (ACCG)
ancient coins
Armenia
Arnold Peter Weiss
art theft
Baltimore coin case
Barry Landau
Booking-Question Exception
Burlgary
Cambodia
Charging Instrument
Child Sexual Assault
Confession
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)
Criminal Record
Criminal Trespass
Cultural Property Advisory Committee (CPAC)
Cultural Property Implementation Act (CPIA)
Custer Museum
Custodial
Dallas Museum of Art
Dallas-Fort Worth Criminal Defense
Defense of Others
Dismissal
Egypt
Endangered Species Act
Evidence
Expunctions
Factual Sufficiency
Felon in Possession
Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act (FSIA)
forfeiture actions
Funny Stories
Getty
Greece
Guatemala
Habeas Corpus
historical documents theft
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
immunity from seizure
International Council of Museums (ICOM)
Iran
ivory
Jason Savedoff
Joshua Knelman
Kazakhstan
Knock and Talk
Lacey Act
LACMA
Legal Sufficiency
legislation
Legislature
lesser-included offenses
Mali
mediation
Medical Care Defense
memorandum of understanding (MoU)
Mexico
Military
Miranda
Montejo
Murder
museums
National Stolen Property Act (NSPA)
Nazi stolen art
Non-Disclosure
Odyssey Marine
Peru
Polygraph
Pre-Trial Motions
prosecutions
Prosecutor Post
receiving stolen property statutes
Red Lists
repatriation
replevin action
Rubin v. Iran
Search and Seizure
seizure
Self-Defense
Self-Incrimination
Sentencing
Sex Offender
Sexual Assault
Social Media
Sotheby's
Spain
St. Louis Art Museum (SLAM)
State Department
Suppression
Tex.Crim.App.
Traffic Tickets
Traffic Violation
U.S. Supreme Court
underwater archaeology
US v. Gordon
US v. Khouli et al.
Variance
Warrant
Wrongful Conviction
Zeyt'un Gospel
Tuesday, September 12, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Th Emergency Red List of Egyptian Cultural Objects at Risk is now available. You may view it here . Published by the International Counci...
-
Recently, a client called me to ask about getting his record “sealed”. It was an exciting feeling for me. Getting asked to evaluate an Expu...
-
Texas Penal Code Section 22.021(a) provides that a person commits aggravated sexual assault if the person intentionally or knowingly causes...
-
Congressman Steve Chabot The U.S. House of Representatives by voice vote yesterday passed the Foreign Cultural Exchange Jurisdictional Immun...
-
Associate Justice Clarence Thomas The US Supreme Court has denied Odyssey Marine Exploration's application for a stay pending the fi...
0 comments:
Post a Comment