Howes v. Fields is a U.S. Supreme Court Case that was released on February 21, 2012. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that there is no bright line rule for determining when an inmate is in "custody," such that Miranda warnings are required if officers wish to questions him about an unrelated crime.
While serving a jail sentence, a corrections officer escorted Fields to a conference room where two police officers questioned him about an unrelated crime. At the beginning of the interview, the officers told Fields that he could leave whenever he wanted. Fields eventually confessed to the crime. The officers never advised Fields of his Miranda warnings or told him that he did not have to speak with him.
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held that any time an inmate is taken from the general prison population and questioned about a crime that occurred outside the prison, he is always in-custody for Miranda purposes. Makes sense, right?
The Supreme Court disagreed. The Court held that serving a term of imprisonment, by itself, is not enough to constitute Miranda custody. When a prisoner is questioned, the determination of Miranda custody should focus on all of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation, to include the language that is used in summoning the prisoner to the interview and the manner in which the interrogation is conducted.
In this case, the Court held that Fields was not in-custody for Miranda purposes. Although the interview lasted between five and seven hours and continued well past the time Fields went to bed, the officers told Fields several times that he could leave and go back to his cell whenever he wanted. Additionally, the interview was conducted in comfortable conference room, the officers did not physically restrain or threaten Fields and they offered him food and water. All of these facts are consistent with an interrogation environment in which a reasonable person would have felt free to terminate the interview and leave. Sumber http://thetrialwarrior.blogspot.com/
Advertisiment
Kategori
10th Ct. of Appeals
11th Ct. of Appeals
13th Ct. of Appeals
4th Amendment
5th Amendment
5th Circuit
5th Ct. of Appeals
6th Ct. of Appeals
8th Ct. of Appeals
admiralty and maritime law
Ancient Coin Collectors Guild (ACCG)
ancient coins
Armenia
Arnold Peter Weiss
art theft
Baltimore coin case
Barry Landau
Booking-Question Exception
Burlgary
Cambodia
Charging Instrument
Child Sexual Assault
Confession
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)
Criminal Record
Criminal Trespass
Cultural Property Advisory Committee (CPAC)
Cultural Property Implementation Act (CPIA)
Custer Museum
Custodial
Dallas Museum of Art
Dallas-Fort Worth Criminal Defense
Defense of Others
Dismissal
Egypt
Endangered Species Act
Evidence
Expunctions
Factual Sufficiency
Felon in Possession
Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act (FSIA)
forfeiture actions
Funny Stories
Getty
Greece
Guatemala
Habeas Corpus
historical documents theft
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
immunity from seizure
International Council of Museums (ICOM)
Iran
ivory
Jason Savedoff
Joshua Knelman
Kazakhstan
Knock and Talk
Lacey Act
LACMA
Legal Sufficiency
legislation
Legislature
lesser-included offenses
Mali
mediation
Medical Care Defense
memorandum of understanding (MoU)
Mexico
Military
Miranda
Montejo
Murder
museums
National Stolen Property Act (NSPA)
Nazi stolen art
Non-Disclosure
Odyssey Marine
Peru
Polygraph
Pre-Trial Motions
prosecutions
Prosecutor Post
receiving stolen property statutes
Red Lists
repatriation
replevin action
Rubin v. Iran
Search and Seizure
seizure
Self-Defense
Self-Incrimination
Sentencing
Sex Offender
Sexual Assault
Social Media
Sotheby's
Spain
St. Louis Art Museum (SLAM)
State Department
Suppression
Tex.Crim.App.
Traffic Tickets
Traffic Violation
U.S. Supreme Court
underwater archaeology
US v. Gordon
US v. Khouli et al.
Variance
Warrant
Wrongful Conviction
Zeyt'un Gospel
Tuesday, September 12, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Th Emergency Red List of Egyptian Cultural Objects at Risk is now available. You may view it here . Published by the International Counci...
-
Recently, a client called me to ask about getting his record “sealed”. It was an exciting feeling for me. Getting asked to evaluate an Expu...
-
Texas Penal Code Section 22.021(a) provides that a person commits aggravated sexual assault if the person intentionally or knowingly causes...
-
Congressman Steve Chabot The U.S. House of Representatives by voice vote yesterday passed the Foreign Cultural Exchange Jurisdictional Immun...
-
Associate Justice Clarence Thomas The US Supreme Court has denied Odyssey Marine Exploration's application for a stay pending the fi...
0 comments:
Post a Comment